Section 6 Boundaries and Links

6.1 Support for DSS File Format

The 2023-03 Release introduces support for time-series data from HEC-DSS files within a boundary condition database. HEC-DSS is a database system for time series, curve, gridded data and more developed by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Hydrologic Engineering Center (HEC). See their website at https://www.hec.usace.army.mil/software/hec-dss/ for more information. It is used by the HEC developed models for data input and output. Rather than convert HEC-DSS time-series curves for use in TUFLOW, this data can be accessed directly. HEC-DSS files organise data into paths with six parts (Part A – Part F) that resemble how files are organised on disk. Figure 6.1 shows an example DSS file with a single path, with the curve plotted below.

**Example DSS File**

Figure 6.1: Example DSS File

To use a HEC-DSS time-series curve within a TUFLOW boundary condition database:

  1. Provide the filename in the “Source” column.
  2. Leave “Column 1”, which is used for time, blank (DSS files store the time with the curve values).
  3. Identify the pathname in “Column 2.” Event placeholders such as event can be used as part of the pathname. Wildcards (*) can be used for parts of the path, however, ensure the wildcards will not select more than one path within the file.
  4. The “Add” and “Mult” columns can be used to offset or scale the time-series values, the same as non-DSS time-series curves.

Figure 6.2 shows how the time-series curve above could be included in a boundary condition database. A wildcard is used for Part D of the pathname (date range). Note that the pathname must start with a forward slash (/).

**Time-series Curve Example**

Figure 6.2: Time-series Curve Example

By default, TUFLOW uses the first point in the time-series curve as TUFLOW time-zero. This can be changed using the new command “HEC-DSS Start Date” to identify the date/time that should be used for time-zero. The date should be in the isodate format: yyyy-mm-dd hh:mm:ss, where the time portions are optional.

HEC-DSS Start Date == 2022-01-01

Note: Non-time series data such as gridded data from a HEC-DSS file is not supported at this time. Contact to request other features that would be beneficial to your workflows.

6.2 SX Momentum

2023-03 Release has improved the handling of momentum flux at SX cells. This change has minor impact on SX cells with sub-critical flow. However, for the SX cells connected to high energy/velocity 1D structures, this enhancement would improve the boundary cell flow behaviour by applying appropriate momentum source/sink. For more details, please refer to the HWRS conference paper (Gao et al., 2022).

HPC SX Momentum Approach == Method B

Previously, only mass flux has been added to SX cells. For backward capability, please use:

HPC SX Momentum Approach == Method A

Note: Build 2023-03-AB fixes an minor issue with the reporting of HPC SX Momentum Approach in the .tlf which was missing a new line if Method A was specified.

6.3 Structure Loss Adjustment for SX Connected 1D Structures

Build 2020-10-AA introduced a new beta option to extend the adjustment of contraction and expansion losses for 1D culverts and bridges to automatically adjust at 1D/2D SX connections (refer to Section 6.2 in the 2020 Release Notes). This feature has been tested using Venturi flume experiment and real-world flood model (Gao et al., 2022). However, it is still under development and remains as beta functionality.

6.4 Quadtree Parallel Inertia on HT / HX Boundaries

For the 2023-03 Release the handling of inertia parallel at head boundaries for Quadtree simulations (“HT” and “HX” type 2d_bc layers) has been changed to “Method B” to provide better consistency with TUFLOW Classic and single level HPC. A new .tcf command has been introduced:

Quadtree BC Parallel Inertia Approach == Method A | { Method B}

To revert to the 2020 Release method, use “Method A”.

6.5 HPC Support for Boundary Spline Interpolation

The 2023-03 Release adds support for boundary cubic spline interpolation (“S” flag in the 2d_bc layer) for HT and QT type boundaries in HPC and Quadtree. Previously, if users specified a spline interpolation HPC would use linear interpolation and no warning message was produced.

6.6 Default HPC Boundary Approach

As outlined in Section 6.1.1 of the 2020 Release Notes, HPC Boundary Approach == Method C is now the default. This approach applies a boundary energy correction to HT boundaries but not for HX cells connected to the same node.

6.7 QT 2d_bc Point Boundaries No Longer Supported in Classic/HPC

Build 2023-03-AD has removed support for ‘QT’ type boundaries using point geometries in the 2D domain for Classic/HPC models. If a ‘QT’ boundary using point geometry is encountered, TUFLOW will produce “ERROR 2835 - Not expecting point for BC layer with type: QT”. This change aligns Classic/HPC with Quadtree.

It is recommended to use line geometry types when adding ‘QT’ boundaries to the 2D domain, however, for old models the command Defaults == Pre 2023 can be used to enable QT points in Classic/HPC.

6.8 HQ 2d_bc Point Boundaries No Longer Supported in Classic/HPC/Quadtree

Build 2023-03-AD has removed support for ‘HQ’ type boundaries using point geometries in the 2D domain for Classic/HPC/Quadtree models. If a ‘HQ’ boundary using point geometry is encountered, TUFLOW will produce “ERROR 2835 - Not expecting point for BC layer with type: HQ”.

It is recommended to use line geometry types when adding ‘HQ’ boundaries to the 2D domain, however, for old models the command Defaults == Pre 2023 can be used to enable HQ points in Classic/HPC.

6.9 Support for Holland Cyclone/Hurricane in HPC/Quadtree

Build 2023-03-AD includes support in HPC/Quadtree for cyclone / hurricane wind and pressure fields with the Holland parametric model. Previously this feature was only supported in Classic. This is specified with either of the .tcf commands below, which are treated identically:

Read GIS Cyclone == \(\langle\)gis layer\(\rangle\)
Read GIS Hurricane == \(\langle\)gis layer\(\rangle\)

This command can be used to read a cyclone or hurricane track. The attributes of the GIS layer are listed in Table 6.1 and are all float values. Only the first polyline in the layer is read and used for the track. Points are snapped to the line wherever attribute data are to be assigned. It is not necessary to have points snapped to every vertex of the line – values will be interpolated between the digitised points. There must be points with attribute data snapped to the start and end of the polyline track.

The optional No Pressure and No Wind options deactivate the pressure/wind fields respectively. E.g. Read GIS Cyclone No Wind == \(\langle\)gis layer\(\rangle\) will only apply the pressure field and ignore the wind.

Table 6.1: GIS Attribute Details for Cyclone (2d_cyc) layer
Attribute Number GIS Attribute Description Data Type
1 Time Time in hours Float
2 p0 Pressure at the eye (hPa) Float
3 pn Pressure of surrounds (hPa) Float
4 R Radius to maximum winds (m) Float
5 B See reference below Float
6 rho_air Density of Air (kg/m3). If zero, Density of Air is used. Float
7 km Density of Air (kg/m3). If zero, Density of Air is used. Float
8 ThetaMax See reference below Float
9 DeltaFM See reference below Float
10 bw_speed Background wind speed in m/s (ignored if less than or equal to zero) Float
11 bw_dirn Background wind direction in degrees relative to East (0°), North (90°), etc. Float

The generation of the wind and pressure fields are based on Appendix C of “Queensland Climate Change and Community Vulnerability to Tropical Cyclones – Ocean Hazards Assessment – Stage 1” (Queensland Government, 2001).

The wind and pressure fields can be output using the WI10 and AP options for Map Output Data Types. The background wind is applied outside R (the radius of maximum winds), if it exceeds the cyclone/hurricane wind speed.

Note: that Latitude must be specified (via .tcf command Latitude == \(\langle\)latitude value\(\rangle\)”).

6.10 Minor Enhancements and Bug Fixes

The 2023-03 Release includes a range of minor enhancements and bug fixes relating to boundaries.

6.10.1 Should Not Be Here When Reading TS1 File

The 2023-03 Release changes a “Should not be here csv_to_binary[ncolA]” message to ERROR 0628. This error can occur if the TS1 file has become corrupted or if the user accidentally makes manual edits to the file.

6.10.2 Duplicate SA Boundary Names

The 2023-03 Release changes the behaviour of HPC and Classic models that use multiple SA polygons with the same boundary name. In the 2023-03 Release, these boundaries are treated separately; as if they were different boundary names with the same hydrograph. Previously, these SA boundaries would be treated as a single boundary and the cells selected by each polygon would be grouped together.

If duplicate SA boundary names are encountered, TUFLOW will issue CHECK 2492 in the 2023-03 Release. The old method can be invoked by reverting to the pre-2023 defaults and WARNING 2492 is produced instead of the check message.

The previous method is not available in Quadtree as this has always used the 2023 default method.

6.10.3 CSV Inputs Containing Multiple Blocks

The 2023-03 Release fixes an issue with XF files and .csv boundary data that could occur if there were multiple blocks of data within the .csv file. The file is considered to have multiple blocks when there is boundary data below other boundary data, for example in in Figure 6.3.

**CSV Input Containing Multiple Blocks**

Figure 6.3: CSV Input Containing Multiple Blocks

If there are multiple blocks, no XF file will be generated in the 2023-03 Release and WARNING 0627 will be issued. Previously TUFLOW would generate an XF file for the first inflow block it read in and ERROR 0141 could be triggered if inflows in other blocks were required (as they would not be present in the XF file).

6.10.4 BC Zero Flow End Fixed in Quadtree

The 2023-03 Release fixes the “BC Zero Flow == End” command for Quadtree models. Previously this command was not working and no warning message was produced.

6.10.5 BC Zero Flow CHECK Message

The 2023-03 Release adds CHECK 0249 if the “BC Zero Flow ==” command changes the inflow hydrograph (i.e. the current start or end value was non-zero).

6.10.6 Automatic Initial Water Level When Interpolated

The 2023-03 Release fixes a bug that could cause the incorrect water level to be applied when using “Set IWL == Auto”. This could happen if the automatic water level at the start time of the simulation required interpolation from the HT boundary data.

6.10.7 SX Region with Z Flag in Quadtree Model

The 2023-03 Release fixes a bug that occurred when using a “Z” flag in a 2d_bc “SX” type region. Previously, the Z flag did not lower the cell face and corner elevations in Quadtree models.

6.10.8 Small SX Region Selects At Least One Cell in Quadtree Model

Previously, if a small SX region doesn’t select any cell centroid in Quadtree models, the SX region was ignored. In the 2023-03 Release, the centroid of the SX region will be used to select at least one boundary cell.

6.10.9 Check for Correct Attribute for SA RF Boundaries

Read GIS SA RF boundaries require 5 GIS attributes compared to the Read GIS SA which only requires a single attribute. For 2023-03-AA a check is performed that the GIS layer has at least 5 attributes and stops with ERROR 2589 if insufficient attributes are present. This can prevent TUFLOW from crashing when reading these boundaries.

6.10.10 Bug Fix for XF files when Time Column has Zero Rows of Data

Build 2023-03-AA fixes an issue with processing and reading of boundary xf files, if the data in column 1, which is time for a level-time (HT) or flow (QT) has zero rows of data, but the column 2 has valid data. This will now generate an ERROR 0651 and halt the simulation.

6.11 2023-03-AB Minor Enhancements and Bug Fixes

6.11.1 Quadtree HQ Total Boundary - Should Not Be Here

Build 2023-03-AB changes the ‘should not be here’ that could occur for quadtree models when using an HQ boundary ‘Total’ approach (this is the default method for HQ boundaries) to ERROR 2858.

The error was being triggered by the cell selection algorithm failing to create a contiguous line of cells which is required to generate a rating curve. This is in turn can be caused by refinement areas being snapped to the boundary line and causing varied cell size along the boundary (where the line can also pass through inactive areas). The best solution to the error is to buffer refinement areas away from the boundary line.

6.11.2 Better Handling of Null Objects in 2d_sa Layer

Build 2023-03-AB improves the handling of Null objects in the 2d_sa input layer. The objects have no geometry and could previously cause an ERROR 2041 to be issued. For build 2023-03-AB these are ignored.

6.12 2023-03-AC Minor Enhancements and Bug Fixes

6.12.1 Fixes Issue with NetCDF Rainfall with Times Greater Than 1,000 Hours

Build 2023-03-AC fixes an issue with NetCDF rainfall inputs with time values greater than 1,000 hours and boundary increments smaller than 1hr, previously this could cause the rainfall boundary to be updated only every hour and not at the boundary frequency.

6.12.2 Fixes Issue with Rainfall Control File with Greater than 1,000 Output Times

Build 2023-03-AC fixes an issue with creating gridded rainfalls in NetCDF file format if more than 1,000 hours hyetograph points was used. Previously this could cause a simulation to terminate during initialisation.

6.13 2023-03-AD Minor Enhancements and Bug Fixes

6.13.1 Bug Fix for 2D HQ Boundaries Selecting Only One Cell

Build 2023-03-AD fixes a bug that could cause unexpected behaviour (e.g. unrelated errors may be thrown spuriously during initialisation) if a HQ boundary that only selected a single cell was used. This would only occur if the HQ boundary that selected a single cell was the last HQ boundary processed by TUFLOW.

6.13.2 Bug Fix for Quadtree Automatic SX Connections Where “Conn_No” is Set to -1

Build 2023-03-AD fixes a bug affecting Quadtree models only, where the functionality of setting the “Conn_No” to “-1” for 1d_nwk layers was not working. When setting the “Conn_No” to “-1”, TUFLOW should connect the pit or node to one 2D cell only, irrespective of the width. Previously, for Quadtree models, the number of 2D cells selected was still being controlled by the width of the pit or node.

6.13.3 Bug Fix for SA Check Files

Build 2023-03-AD fixes an issue that could occur in Quadtree models if writing check files in mif/mid format in conjunction with using the Read GIS SA ALL command. If this combination resulted in more than 10,000 cells being selected by a single SX polygon, TUFLOW would crash. In In addition to fixing this, a change has been made to ensure the SAC check file consistently writes all selected cells when the “ALL” option is used.

6.13.4 Bug Fix for Very Large Models with SX Connections

Build 2023-03-AD fixes an issue that could cause TUFLOW to crash when writing the first output, with no error message. This issue only occurred for very large models with a significant number of SX connections.

6.13.5 Bug Fix for Gridded Rainfall in HPC

Build 2023-03-AD fixes an issue that could occur with gridded rainfall when the time of first rainfall was after the start of the simulation and there was no temporal map output at the time of first rainfall. This could cause the rainfall grids to be updated incorrectly, resulting in some grid times to be skipped. This issue could affect HPC (including quadtree), but did not affect Classic simulations.

6.13.6 Support for Global Wind Boundary in Quadtree

Build 2023-03-AD includes support in Quadtree for global wind stress applied via a Global Wind BC == \(\langle\)boundary name\(\rangle\) in the .tesf. Refer to Section 7.6 of the 2018 TUFLOW Manual for documentation of this functionality.

References

Gao, S., Ryan, P., Syme, W., & Collecutt, G. (2022). The End of the 1D Open Channel Cross-Section? Hydrology & Water Resources Symposium. https://tuflow.com/media/7547/2022-the-end-of-the-1d-open-channel-cross-section-gao-et-al-hwrs.pdf
Queensland Government. (2001). Queensland Climate Change and Community Vulnerability to Tropical Cyclones - Ocean Hazrds Assessment. https://www.systemsengineeringaustralia.com.au/download/Ocean_Hazards_Assess_Stage1A_revised.pdf